So . . . Pete Hegseth and the Iran War

April 8, 2026·12 min·1 clip

Why Christians shouldn't start from scratch when evaluating war, according to 2,000 years of church tradition.

This episode applies Christian just war theory to a hypothetical future war with Iran in April 2026. Host Douglas Wilson, a pastor and theologian, evaluates the conflict's morality from a biblical worldview. He specifically examines the roles of Israel and the United States under this framework. Wilson breaks down the *jus ad bellum* criteria, grading Israel's "just cause" as a 10 due to Iran's proxy war through Hamas and Hezbollah. He rates the U.S. just cause a 7, noting many American deaths attributed to Iran occurred in active war zones. He suggests geopolitical motives involving Russia, China, and oil could raise that score. Wilson states both nations had a "righteous intention" (a score of 10) to prevent a nuclear Iran. He gives both a 10 for "reasonable chance of success" for an air campaign but warns that deploying regular ground troops would lower that to a 5. On "proportionality," he gives current targeting of military facilities a 9 but warns against rhetoric advocating wider destruction. A significant portion analyzes President Trump's rhetorical style, advising listeners to take him "seriously" but "not literally." Wilson references a threatened attack if the Strait of Hormuz wasn't opened, which was followed by a ceasefire he interprets as Iran "blinking." He critiques commentators who simultaneously call Trump a "genocidal lunatic" and a "lily-livered coward." The episode also addresses Wilson's connection to Pete Hegseth, portrayed as the U.S. Secretary of War and a fellow church member in the CREC denomination. Wilson clarifies his role is public commentator, not a policy advisor to Hegseth, citing a lack of security clearance and military intel. He quotes C.S. Lewis to argue that private citizens should not assume the same responsibility as governments for declaring a war just. Wilson states he trusts Hegseth to act on his Christian convictions and access to confidential information. He criticizes online critics who, with minimal information, accuse Hegseth of war crimes. The tone is didactic and assertive, blending theological instruction with political commentary. The style is conversational yet structured around a formal ethical framework. Listeners interested in Christian ethics, geopolitical analysis from a conservative Reformed perspective, and critiques of foreign policy will find this episode engaging. Those seeking a secular or non-theological analysis of military conflict should skip it.

As heard by us

A forceful, theologically grounded take on the Iran war, grounded in just-war analysis and sharpened with a few partisan elbows.

Blog & Mablog treats the Iran war as a test of Christian moral judgment. It starts with just war theory and the split between ad bellum and in bello, then measures the campaign against its stated aims, the means used, and the way it was sold.

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

Want a Christian just-war take on the Iran war?

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from Blog & Mablog