Blizzlet: Hearthstone

#409 So... if I was gone... what's up with Pets?

·1 hr 2 min·5 clips
Daniel describes screaming for 30 minutes as a kid while a dentist pulled four molars with zero numbing.
The episode opens with the hosts sharing personal anecdotes, including Daniel's traumatic childhood dentist experience involving four molar extractions without numbing. They transition to discussing Hearthstone's new King Crush pet, a cosmetic feature obtainable through a Darkmoon Prize gacha system with a .1% drop rate and a $158 guarantee. The hosts criticize this as predatory, comparing it to a Nigerian Prince scam and noting the lack of in-client odds disclosure. They review the current Hearthstone meta, where Murloc Paladin has a 58% win rate and many quests are underperforming, with several classes below 40% win rates. Smarms shares her enthusiasm for Murloc Paladin, even playing it on her phone to the point of walking into objects. The hosts play a game where they guess new card names from hints, humorously misnaming cards like 'Slam Harder, Daddy' for 'Enter the Lost City'. They debate which new card is the 'wettest' in a 90s movie aesthetic, with options including Tyrannogill, Elise the Navigator, and Story of Barnabas. The episode concludes with single-sentence thoughts on Hearthstone and a plug for Tally's vet fundraiser stream.

As heard by us

A Borg-heavy detour turns into a funny, pointed argument about Hearthstone pets, price, odds, and monetized frustration.

Hearthstone pets become the center of a sustained argument about what the feature is actually selling. The discussion opens on flashy CGI, measures the rollout against pets in MTGA, then settles into the $168 buy-in, missing odds, ugly margins, and the sense that the client is…

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

Hearthstone pets get the concierge treatment: CGI money, $168, hidden odds, and a Borg Queen detour before the dirtier wrap-up.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →
Listen to the show on