Aviation Week's Window Seat Podcast · Aviation Week

Airlines, Airports And War Zones

·24 min·1 clip

Matt Borey identifies Houthi attacks on commercial vessels and Saudi oil facilities as the next potential oil-price spike.

The war frames the operational question. Karen Walker leaves the military analysis to others and keeps the conversation on airlines and airports dealing with conflict-related disruption in the Gulf region and globally. Matt Borey comes at it through risk. As Osprey Flight Solutions' co-founder and Chief Intelligence Officer, he sees a security event, but one that still depends on familiar aviation response discipline. The pressure point is activation. Emergency response plans are not paperwork in this scenario. They decide what happens when aircraft divert, passengers move, and terminals have to change posture fast. Communication does a lot of the work. Borey says messages need to reach passengers, airport staff, airline teams, aircraft on the ground, and flights getting ready to arrive or depart. The runway gets attention too. Aircraft close to departure may need to be moved into designated safe areas on the airport grounds. Walker pushes on the plan itself, drawing out the gap between having an emergency response plan and actually using it under conflict-zone pressure. Borey agrees. The industry usually thinks about these procedures around mechanical failures, weather diversions, runway excursions, or other safety events. The cause is different here, but the operating problem is familiar: people, aircraft, and schedules are exposed to a hazardous disruption. Duration makes it harder. A runway incident might last several hours or maybe a day. Conflict-related risk can keep airports and airlines in response mode much longer. Walker ends with cautious framing. A two-week war would be the better scenario, but the job is still adaptation with safety first.

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from Aviation Week's Window Seat Podcast