Animal Spirits Podcast · The Compound

Talk Your Book: Investing in a Concentrated Stock Market

·32 min·2 clips
Small caps are outperforming large caps by 13% as monetary and fiscal policies benefit highly indebted companies.
Michael opens by playfully noting that SPY was technically not the first ETF ever -- Canada had one before the U.S. -- before introducing Matt Bartolini, one of their most frequent return guests. Michael describes a chart he shared with Josh Brown showing the Mag 7 divided by the S&P 493 ratio breaking down while simultaneously the Russell 2000 is breaking out relative to the S&P. He asks whether this is bullish or bearish for the overall market. Matt argues it is broadly bullish for the economy: the broadening of returns away from concentration signals fiscal and monetary policy is benefiting a wider range of businesses. He notes small caps have outperformed large caps by 13% since late July when the Fed signaled rate cuts, and small caps now have double-digit earnings growth forecasted for 2026. The conversation explores ETF flows as a real-time signal of investor behavior and conviction. Matt discusses how SPDR data shows retail and institutional investors positioning differently across styles. They discuss the extraordinary degree of concentration in the S&P 500, where a handful of stocks drive most of the index's returns, and ask whether the 493 taking the baton from the Mag 7 is a healthy handoff or a warning sign. Matt explains why he thinks broadening is sustainable: earnings revisions are being made to the upside broadly, and fiscal tailwinds from legislation benefit consumer-oriented small caps. A discussion of what the Fed might do if inflation keeps easing leads to an interesting question: if the Fed funds rate fell to 2%, would that be bullish (accommodative stimulus) or bearish (the economy is so weak they have to cut that far)? Matt says he would be concerned, noting the U.S. output gap is currently positive (actual GDP above potential), which typically does not call for rate cuts, and that rates in the twos would risk reigniting inflation. Michael pushes back with the possibility that AI-driven job displacement could create a scenario where growth is high but employment is weak, producing a K-shaped economy that justifies further cuts. The episode ends without a definitive answer, highlighting how much uncertainty surrounds the current macro environment.

As heard by us

SPY becomes a sharp lens on concentration, yields, and the market's changing cash-return mix.

The episode uses SPY as a clean entry point into a broader look at how concentrated the market has become, tying AI, the other 493, and the Mach 7 into one frame.

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

If SPY feels like the market's oldest inside joke, this one explains the punchline.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →
Listen to the show on