Fyodor Dostoevsky: An Introduction | Joshua Yen | Ep. #287

·41 min·4 clips

Dostoevsky presented three distinct models of atheism, including Ivan Karamazov's rejection of God's world.

Host of Adherent Apologetics interviews Josh Yen, an undergraduate at the University of Oxford studying philosophy and theology. Yen explains his personal interest in Dostoevsky as a gateway to philosophy. The episode begins with an introduction to Dostoevsky as a 19th-century Russian writer whose influence spans literature, psychology, and philosophy of religion. They discuss whether Dostoevsky can be considered a philosopher of religion despite writing fiction. Yen outlines Dostoevsky's biographical trajectory: raised Christian, then an atheist/socialist phase influenced by the Petrashevsky circle, imprisonment in Siberia, and a return to Christianity shaped by personal tragedies like his son's death. The conversation delves into Dostoevsky's complex relationship with atheism, presenting three models from his characters: Ivan Karamazov's rejection of God's world, Raskolnikov's belief that without God anything is permissible, and Kirillov's desire to become God. Yen emphasizes Dostoevsky's Eastern Orthodox faith, distinct from Catholicism and Protestantism, and his focus on love and forgiveness as seen in The Idiot. They explore Dostoevsky's radical individualism, contrasting it with 19th-century systematic thinkers like Hegel and Marx. The literary debate between monophonic and polyphonic interpretations of his works is examined, with examples from Demons and The Brothers Karamazov. Dostoevsky's view of human nature as inherently free, capable of both good and evil, is discussed alongside his critique of nihilism. The episode concludes with Yen's personal reflections on why Dostoevsky remains compelling due to his realistic portrayal of human depravity and redemption, and a mention of Yen's academic paper on Dostoevsky.

As heard by us

Dostoevsky's characters stay free enough to fail, which makes their philosophical conflicts harder to settle and more revealing.

Dostoevsky comes through as a writer of freedom, evil, and convictions that refuse to settle neatly. Josh Yen frames the episode around Ivan, Alyosha, and Dimitri, keeping attention on a world where no position simply triumphs: Ivan is driven insane, Alyosha neither wins him…

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

You want Dostoevsky without a tidy hero? Press play for freedom, fractured viewpoints, and a conversation that refuses to crown an easy winner.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from Adherent Apologetics